JotForm has been filling its Twitter feed with customer service attempts at helping upset customers, and making it clear it has no information on why the. And the damage here for a small business is massive. As JotForm notes, it’s important to recognize that the US government already believes it has these powers. It’s this kind of overly broad censorship (and, yes, this is clear censorship) that is what people were afraid of under SOPA. Even if the forms were being used for some illegal purpose (and it’s important to note that Section 230 does not apply to criminal activity - just civil offenses), I still can’t fathom a reason why it should lead to everyone else getting censored and an internet startup facing a massive hardship wherein tons of users have had their service disrupted with millions of useful forms being suddenly disappeared.Īnd I won’t even bother spending any time on the fact that apparently it was GoDaddy who helped the US government “suspend” the domain.įor a government that insists it’s trying to help small businesses and startups, to go and disrupt one and all of its users over some possible illegal usage by a small number of users is just crazy. I’m at a loss as to how this possibly makes sense. This can happen to any web site that allows user generated content. It is not possible for us to manually review all forms. All they have to do is to ask GoDaddy to take a site down. SOPA may not have passed, but what happened shows that it is already being practiced. This can happen to any site that allows public to post content. Many people on the comments assumed the content was posted by us. The website, which allows individuals to create their own forms easily, has had its main domain, “suspended” by the US government, due to “an ongoing investigation.” Because of this JotForm is forcing all of its users to change their forms to use their. But there are some loopholes where technically there are no official safe harbors (though common sense says you still shouldn’t be liable). This is the core purpose behind Section 230 of the CDA (and, to a lesser extent) the DMCA’s safe harbors. That is, if you set up a website where users can post stuff, the people who post stuff are liable for the content - not you as the service provider in the middle. One of the key principles behind the growth of the internet was belief in protection against secondary liability claims. Thu, Feb 16th 2012 07:40am - Mike Masnick
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |